lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/13] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for fallback
From
On 16/03/2023 07:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/03/2023 13:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 14/03/2023 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Changes since v1
>>> ================
>>> 1. Rebase
>>> 2. Make msm8994 fallback for several variants, not msm8953, because the latter
>>> actually might take some clocks.
>>
>> Although the approach looks correct, I think that in some cases it tries
>> to mark devices compatible judging from the current driver, not from the
>> hardware itself.
>
> Which is what compatibility is about...
>
>>
>> For the reference, on msm8994 the apcs is a clock controller for the l2
>> clocks (which we do not support yet). If I'm not mistaken, on msm8976
>> the apcs region contains a mux for the cluster1 clocks. On sdm630/660
>> the apcs region also seems to be involved in CPU clocks scaling.
>
> The question is this means they are incompatible?

Since there are no more comments I assume they are actually compatible
in the terms of SW interface.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 01:12    [W:0.126 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site