lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: Add no-hpd property
From


On 21/03/23 18:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/03/2023 13:02, Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
>>>
>>>> + type: boolean
>>>> + description:
>>>> + Set if the HPD line on the bridge isn't hooked up to anything or is
>>>> + otherwise unusable.
>>>
>>> It's the property of the panel, not bridge. Unless you want to say that
>>> bridge physically does not have HPD? Does it follow the standard in such
>>> case?
>>
>> MHDP does have hpd. But the mhdp driver should handle the cases when the
>
> This is about bindings, not driver. Your driver can still handle this as
> it wishes.
>
>> hpd pin of bridge is not connected to that of the DP-connector. This is
>> to add support for that. (optional property)
>
> Which is indicated by panel no-hpd, right?

Actually no panel is involved in this. For TI SoC J721S2, the data
pipeline involves the bridge whose endpoint is directly the DP connector
with compatible 'dp-connector'. And in the binding dp-connector.yaml,
there isn't any 'no-hpd' property for this indication.

Does this clarifies the issue? Or did I misinterpret your comment?

> Or you mean now that HPD
> physically cannot go to panel because it is cut on the bridge side? But
> isn't this the same case (from hardware/bindings point, not driver) as
> panel would not have HPD?
Warm Regards,
-Jayesh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 01:11    [W:0.115 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site