Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:43:06 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/7 v4] sh: remove sh5/sh64 last fragments | From | Randy Dunlap <> |
| |
On 3/16/23 09:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > >> On Mar 16, 2023, at 5:45 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: >> >> Hi-- >> >>> On 3/16/23 06:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>> Hi Randy! >>> >>>> On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 20:00 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> A previous patch removed most of the sh5 (sh64) support from the >>>> kernel tree. Now remove the last stragglers. >>>> >>>> Fixes: 37744feebc08 ("sh: remove sh5 support") >>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> >>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> >>>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> >>>> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> >>>> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org >>>> Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> >>>> --- >>>> v2: update after adding the parisc64 alias to kbuild.rst >>>> v3: skipped >>>> v4: refresh & resend >>>> >>>> Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 1 - >>>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- >>>> Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- >>>> scripts/checkstack.pl | 7 ------- >>>> tools/perf/arch/common.c | 2 -- >>>> tools/scripts/Makefile.arch | 5 ----- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +- >>>> 8 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff -- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >>>> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >>>> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >>>> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ But some architectures such as x86 and s >>>> >>>> - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit >>>> - parisc: parisc64 for 64 bit >>>> -- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit >>>> - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit >>>> >>>> CROSS_COMPILE >>> >>> This hunk doesn't apply anymore since the parisc part has been dropped although I can't >>> find the commit for that. Could you rebase your patch, please? >> >> The parisc part has not been dropped. It's in linux-next but not yet in mainline. >> (commit 49deed336ef9a) >> >> Do you want this patch to apply to mainline? (I created it in linux-next.) >> I can do that in a few hours. I'm busy ATM. >> >> I suppose there will be a merge conflict between parisc and SH. > > Oops, sorry. My bad. I will use the proper tree.
Just let me know if you want me to resend it. Thanks.
-- ~Randy
| |