lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v3 1/9] net: sunhme: Just restart autonegotiation if we can't bring the link up
From
On 3/15/23 04:20, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 08:36:05PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> If we've tried regular autonegotiation and forcing the link mode, just
>> restart autonegotiation instead of reinitializing the whole NIC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> This patch looks fine to me, as do patches 3 - 4, which is as far as I have
> got with my review.
>
> I do, however, have a general question regarding most of the patches in this
> series: to what extent have they been tested on HW?

I have tested them with some PCI cards, mostly with the other end autonegotiating
100M. This series doesn't really touch the phy state machines, so I think it is
fine to just make sure the link comes up (and things work after bringing the
interface down and up).

> And my follow-up question is: to what extent should we consider removing
> support for hardware that isn't being tested and therefore has/will likely
> have become broken break at some point? Quattro, the subject of a latter
> patch in this series, seems to be a case in point.

Well, I ordered a quattro card (this hardware is quite cheap on ebay) so
hopefully I can test that. The real question is whether there's anyone using this
on sparc. I tried CCing some sparc users mailing lists in the cover letter, but no
luck so far.

--Sean

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 01:01    [W:0.123 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site