Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Mar 2023 19:11:33 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (nct6775) update ASUS WMI monitoring list A520/B360/B460/B550... | From | Guenter Roeck <> |
| |
On 3/15/23 15:35, Denis Pauk wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:17:49 +0200 > Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:04:53 +0200 >> Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:58:24 -0700 >>> Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On 3/15/23 14:30, Denis Pauk wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:01:35 +0200 >>>>> Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Tested-by: Holger Kiehl <holger.kiehl@dwd.de> >>>>> >>>>> Pro A520M-C II/CSM is also tested by Holger Kiehl >>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/patch/868bdc4f-9d45-475c-963e-f5232a8b95@praktifix.dwd.de/ >>>>> >>>>> Could it be applied as single patch or need to rebase over "Pro A520M-C >>>>> II" patch? >>>>> >>>> Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say. I just applied all >>>> patches in sequence as received, with no conflicts. Should I undo that ? >>>> >>>> Guenter >>>> >>> >>> No, Thank you! >>> >>> I just like to mention that Holger Kiehl sent separate patch with >>> "Pro A520M-C II" support and it could create conflicts. I have found it only >>> when I have sent my patches. >>> >> >> I have rechecked repo and "Pro A520M-C II" is added twice after apply both of >> patches (my and from Holger Kiehl), could you please remove one of mention of >> it? > > I have resent updated version of this patch without duplication of adding "Pro > A520M-C II", > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/patch/20230315222702.1803-1-pauk.denis@gmail.com/ > > you could revert this patch and add apply new one, or fix this one. >
Done. You could avoid this kind of problem by keeping board names in alphabetic order.
Guenter
| |