lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] watchdog: ebc-c384_wdt: Migrate to the regmap API
From
On 3/14/23 09:31, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 05:50:42PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:29:16AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>>> The regmap API supports IO port accessors so we can take advantage of
>>> regmap abstractions rather than handling access to the device registers
>>> directly in the driver.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> - Utilize watchdog_set_drvdata() and watchdog_get_drvdata()
>>
>> I'm wondering why you can't use dev_get_regmap() instead.
>
> We can set `wdd->parent = dev` in ebc_c384_wdt_probe(), and then use
> `dev_get_regmap(wdev->parent)` to retrieve the regmap. The only downside
> I see if perhaps the added latency a call to devres_find(), whereas
> using watchdog_get_drvdata() is just a pointer dereference.
>
> I'm indifferent to either choice, so if Guenter or Wim have a preference
> here I'll follow their decision.
>

I am not inclined to accept a patch which calls dev_get_regmap() more
than once. It is not just added latency, it is unnecessarily executing
a lot of code. Maybe that call is abused nowadays, and/or maybe people do not
care about wasting CPU cycles anymore, but that is not its intended use case.

>>
>>> - Map watchdog control registers based on offset 0x1 and adjust regmap
>>> configurations accordingly; offset 0x0 is unused in this driver so we
>>> should avoid unnecessary exposure of it
>>
>> I'm wondering what bad could happen if you expose it.
>
> The WINSYSTEMS EBC-C384 documentation I have does not specify what
> offset 0x0 does (nor offsets 0x3-0x4), so I don't know if there are side
> effects to reading those addresses. Really, I'm just avoiding the hassle
> of writing an explicit precious registers table for those offsets by not
> exposing them at all.
>

Counter questions:
- What would be the purpose of exposing register addresses if they are not needed ?
- What bad can happen by _not_ exposing those register addresses ?

Guenter

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:59    [W:1.689 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site