Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:46:57 +0300 | From | Dan Carpenter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] qede: remove linux/version.h and linux/compiler.h |
| |
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 06:13:16PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > >> Also, as per the examples above, the target tree, in this case > >> 'net-next' should be included in the subject. > > I don't know much about net tree and its location. This is why people use > > Here[0]. > > > linux-next for sending patches. I'm not sure about the networking sub > > No, people use the corresponding mailing lists to send and repositories > to base their patches on. >
This is only for networking.
It affect BPF too, I suppose, but I always tell everyone to just send BPF bug reports instead of patches. I can keep track of linux-next, net and net-next. No one can keep track of all @#$@#$@#$@# 300+ trees.
I really hate this networking requirement but I try really hard to get it right and still mess up half the time.
regards, dan carpenter
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |