Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Date | Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:17:06 -0700 | Subject | Re: Linux 6.3-rc2 |
| |
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 4:11 PM Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> wrote: > > So the hardirq interrupted some code that has softirqs disabled (or > servicing) from the preempt mask POV but not from lockdep POV.
.. but those are two different counters, so isn't that *always* racy? IOW, one counter being updated before the other...
IOW, isn't this *why* that check isn't supposed to ever trigger at all from hard-irq context?
Linus
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |