Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:37:36 -0500 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] use canonical ftrace path whenever possible |
| |
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:06:58 -0700 Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 03:29:49AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 03:33:44PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > > Changes in v2: > > > * Dropped patches which were pulled into maintainer trees. > > > * Split BPF patches out into another series targeting bpf-next. > > > * trace-agent now falls back to debugfs if tracefs isn't present. > > > * Added Acked-by from mst@redhat.com to series. > > > * Added a typo fixup for the virtio-trace README. > > > > > > Steven, assuming there are no objections, would you feel comfortable > > > taking this series through your tree? > > > > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > > > > if you want the virtio patches through my tree after all, let me know. > > Yes, please, that would be great. I'll send out v3 with the few patches that > haven't gotten a response, but I'll drop the virtio patches assuming you've > got them. >
Since the last patch 6/6 is not tracing related, I would prefer it to go through the virtio tree.
For patches 1-5, please add:
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Thanks!
-- Steve
| |