lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/5] gpiolib: cdev: relocate debounce_period_us from struct gpio_desc
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:14:41AM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 05:09:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 05:03:03PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 05:58:11PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:

...

> > > > +static void supinfo_init(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + supinfo.tree = RB_ROOT;
> > > > + spin_lock_init(&supinfo.lock);
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > Can it be done statically?
> > >
> > > supinfo = {
> > > .tree = RB_ROOT,
> > > .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(supinfo.lock),
> >
> > I even checked the current tree, we have 32 users of this pattern in drivers/.
>
> Ah, that is what you meant. Yeah sure can - the supinfo_init() is
> another hangover from when I was trying to create the supinfo per chip,
> but now it is a global a static initialiser makes sense.

Yep, the DEFINE_MUTEX() / DEFINE_SPINLOCK() / etc looks better naturally
than above.

> And I still haven't received the email you quote there.

:-( I'm not sure we will get it, it most likely that I removed it already
and it has disappeared due to problems with email server...

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-12-14 17:42    [W:0.139 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site