Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:56:14 +0200 | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 01/17] pinctrl: intel: Provide Intel pin control wide PM ops structure |
| |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 07:43:50PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 19:41:12 +0000 > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
...
> Actually looking at usecase, why isn't the absence of an EXPORT in > the !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP path not a problem for bisection of this series given > you haven't yet protected the users?
I'm not sure I got the issue you are trying to point out. Between first and last patches the main driver exports two things: the PM ops functions, which are _always_ been exported and PM ops structure, which is exported only when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=y. Every converted user has pm_sleep_ptr() guard added so it shouldn't be a problem. What exactly did I miss?
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |