Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Oct 2023 09:55:16 -0700 | From | Davidlohr Bueso <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] refscale: Optimize process_durations() |
| |
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>process_durations() is not a hot path, but there is no good reason to >iterate over and over the data already in 'buf'. > >Using a seq_buf saves some useless strcat() and the need of a temp buffer. >Data is written directly at the correct place.
Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
| |