lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/2] leds: ledtrig-tty: add new line mode evaluation


On 2023-10-23 14:59, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 02:45:55PM +0200, Florian Eckert wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023-10-23 14:27, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 02:15:55PM +0200, Florian Eckert wrote:
>> > > > Again, I thought we had rx/tx already? If not, how was that controlled
>> > > > today?
>> > >
>> > > It could not be controlled! The LED flashed when data where
>> > > transferred.
>> > > This was the only function that the trigger supported.
>> >
>> > Ok, then maybe this needs to be a bit longer of a series. One that does
>> > the "tx/rx" feature, as that is needed today, and will be the more
>> > complex one, and then one-per-line-setting that you want to apply.
>> >
>> > That should make it much easier to review overall, right?
>>
>> Sorry for asking, but why should I split the change.
>> What is the added value? But if it is necessary, then I will do it.
>>
>> Before my change, the trigger could not be configured.
>> The LED always flashed when data was transferred.
>
> But you could configure that, right? on/off, correct?

No, this could not be configured before. It always flashed as
soon as data went through the configured tty. It couldn't even
be switched off, only if I change the tty interface via sysfs

>> So that the trigger behaves the same as before (flash on rx/tx
>> transmission),
>> I set the rx/tx bits in the function ledtrig_tty_activate() with the
>> following code. Nothing changes for the user of the trigger.
>>
>> /* Enable default rx/tx LED blink */
>> set_bit(TRIGGER_TTY_TX, &trigger_data->ttytrigger);
>> set_bit(TRIGGER_TTY_RX, &trigger_data->ttytrigger);
>
> I agree, but now you are splitting this up into a much finer grained
> feature.
>
> Anyway, just a thought, I'll defer to the LED maintainers here as to
> how
> they want to see this, I thought it would actually be easier this way,
> maybe not, your call.

Thank you for your review. I will incorporate your comments and split
the changes.
:+1:

---
Florian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-10-23 15:19    [W:0.217 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site