Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:14:39 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/1] Put seq_buf on a diet |
| |
On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 20:45:13 +0100 "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> Prompted by the recent mails on ksummit, let's actually try to make this > work this time. We need a container for manipulating strings easily, > and seq_buf is the closest thing we have to it. The only problem I have > with it is the readpos that is only useful for the tracing code today. > So move it from the seq_buf to the tracing code. > > We should go further with this patch series, including using seq_buf > within vsprintf, but if we can't get over this hurdle first, I'm not > going to waste my time on this again. > > Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) (1): > trace: Move readpos from seq_buf to trace_seq > > include/linux/seq_buf.h | 5 +---- > include/linux/trace_seq.h | 2 ++ > kernel/trace/trace.c | 10 +++++----- > kernel/trace/trace_seq.c | 6 +++++- > lib/seq_buf.c | 13 +++++-------- > 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >
Thanks Matthew, I'll pull this in and add it to my for-next queue (after testing)
-- Steve
| |