Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:23:43 -0700 | From | Jakub Kicinski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ethtool: ice: Support for RSS settings to GTP from ethtool |
| |
Thanks for the v2!
Adding Willem, Pablo, and Harald to CC (please CC them on future versions).
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 06:01:15 +0000 Takeru Hayasaka wrote: > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h > index f7fba0dc87e5..a2d4f2081cf3 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h > @@ -2011,6 +2011,18 @@ static inline int ethtool_validate_duplex(__u8 duplex) > #define IPV4_FLOW 0x10 /* hash only */ > #define IPV6_FLOW 0x11 /* hash only */ > #define ETHER_FLOW 0x12 /* spec only (ether_spec) */ > +#define GTPU_V4_FLOW 0x13 /* hash only */ > +#define GTPU_V6_FLOW 0x14 /* hash only */ > +#define GTPC_V4_FLOW 0x15 /* hash only */ > +#define GTPC_V6_FLOW 0x16 /* hash only */ > +#define GTPC_TEID_V4_FLOW 0x17 /* hash only */ > +#define GTPC_TEID_V6_FLOW 0x18 /* hash only */ > +#define GTPU_EH_V4_FLOW 0x19 /* hash only */ > +#define GTPU_EH_V6_FLOW 0x20 /* hash only */
nit: please note that these are hex numbers, next value after 0x19 is 0x1a, not 0x20.
> +#define GTPU_UL_V4_FLOW 0x21 /* hash only */ > +#define GTPU_UL_V6_FLOW 0x22 /* hash only */ > +#define GTPU_DL_V4_FLOW 0x23 /* hash only */ > +#define GTPU_DL_V6_FLOW 0x24 /* hash only */ > /* Flag to enable additional fields in struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec */ > #define FLOW_EXT 0x80000000 > #define FLOW_MAC_EXT 0x40000000
What gives me pause here is the number of flow sub-types we define for GTP hashing.
My understanding of GTP is limited to what I just read on Wikipedia.
IIUC the GTPC vs GTPU distinction comes down to the UDP port on which the protocol runs? Are the frames also different? I'm guessing UL/DL are uplink/downlink but what's EH?
How do GTPU_V4_FLOW, GTPU_EH_V4_FLOW, GTPU_UL_V4_FLOW, and GTPU_DL_V4_FLOW differ?
Key question is - are there reasonable use cases that you can think of for enabling GTP hashing for each one of those bits individually or can we combine some of them?
> @@ -2025,6 +2037,7 @@ static inline int ethtool_validate_duplex(__u8 duplex) > #define RXH_IP_DST (1 << 5) > #define RXH_L4_B_0_1 (1 << 6) /* src port in case of TCP/UDP/SCTP */ > #define RXH_L4_B_2_3 (1 << 7) /* dst port in case of TCP/UDP/SCTP */ > +#define RXH_GTP_TEID (1 << 8) /* teid in case of GTP */ > #define RXH_DISCARD (1 << 31)
| |