Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:36:05 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] hugetlb: restructure pool allocations | From | Konrad Dybcio <> |
| |
On 10/10/23 23:45, Mike Kravetz wrote: > On 10/10/23 23:30, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> >> >> On 10/10/23 02:07, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 08:15:13 -0700 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> This should also be empty and a noop. >>>>> >>>>> Is it possible that the misaligned kernel image could make these lists >>>>> appear as non-empty? >>>> >>>> Actually, just saw this: >>>> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231009145605.2150897-1-usama.arif@bytedance.com/ >>>> >>>> Will take a look, although as mentioned above prep_and_add_bootmem_folios on >>>> an empty list should be a noop. >>> >>> Konrad, are you able to test Usama's patch? Thanks. >> I legitimately spent a sad amount of time trying to regain access to the >> remote board farm. Previously I could hit the bug on SM8550, but now I can't >> do it on SM8450, SM8350 and SM8250 (previous gens), with the same config.. I >> have no idea when I'll be able to get access to SM8550 again. >> >> I did test it on the QCM6490 Fairphone 5 that I initially reported this on, >> and neither booting next-20231010 (with your patchset applied) nor adding >> the below patch on top of it seems to work. I can't get serial output from >> this device though to find out what it's unhappy about :/ > > Sorry for causing you to spend so much time on this. No worries, that was my explanation for why it took me so long to respond again..
> > As mentioned in the reply to Usama's patch, the root cause seems to be > the locking. So, the real change to test is the locking changes in > that thread; not Usama's patch. Ack
Konrad
| |