Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:51:42 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | unneeded btrfs changes -- Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/162] 6.1.57-rc1 review |
| |
Hi! On Mon 2023-10-09 14:59:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.57 release. > There are 162 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:00:55 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.57-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > and the diffstat can be found below. >
> Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> > btrfs: use struct fscrypt_str instead of struct qstr > > Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> > btrfs: setup qstr from dentrys using fscrypt helper > > Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> > btrfs: use struct qstr instead of name and namelen pairs
These are rather intrusive, and marked with
Stable-dep-of: 9af86694fd5d ("btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock in direct io write")
but we don't have that one in 6.1, so we should not have these, either.
Best regards, Pavel
-- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |