Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:13:19 +0530 | Subject | Re: [Patch v3 0/2] Improvements to the Tegra CPUFREQ driver | From | Sumit Gupta <> |
| |
On 10/10/23 11:07, Viresh Kumar wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > On 09-10-23, 17:06, Sumit Gupta wrote: >> >> >> On 04/10/23 19:35, Sumit Gupta wrote: >>> This patch set adds below improvements to the Tegra194 CPUFREQ driver. >>> They are applicable to all the Tegra SoC's supported by the driver. >>> >>> 1) Patch 1: Avoid making SMP call on every frequency request to reduce >>> the time for frequency set and get calls. >>> >>> 2) Patch 2: Use reference clock count based loop instead of udelay() >>> to improve the accuracy of re-generated CPU frequency. >>> >>> The patches are not related but have minor conflict. So, need to be >>> applied in order of patch numbers. If 'Patch 2' is to be applied first >>> then will rebase that and send separately. >>> >>> --- >>> v1[2] -> v3: >>> - Patch 1: used sizeof(*data->cpu_data) in devm_kcalloc(). >>> >>> v1[1] -> v2: >>> - Patch 1: added new patch. >>> - Patch 2: changed subject and patch order. >>> >>> Sumit Gupta (2): >>> cpufreq: tegra194: save CPU data to avoid repeated SMP calls >>> cpufreq: tegra194: use refclk delta based loop instead of udelay >>> >>> drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- >>> 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) >>> >>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901164113.29139-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/ >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901152046.25662-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/ >>> >> >> Hi Viresh, >> >> If there is no further comment. >> Can we please still apply these patches for 6.7 ? > > Applied. Thanks. > > FWIW, you should have rebased the other commit (which removes cpu > online mask) over this one. I had to fix the commit manually now. > > -- > viresh
Sorry, my bad. Thank you for your help.
Best Regards, Sumit Gupta
| |