lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH memory-model 3/4] Documentation: Fixed a typo in atomic_t.txt
Date
From: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@outlook.com>

Fixed a typo in the word 'architecture'.

Signed-off-by: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/atomic_t.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
index 0f1ffa03db09a..d7adc6d543db4 100644
--- a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
+++ b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ atomic operations.

Specifically 'simple' cmpxchg() loops are expected to not starve one another
indefinitely. However, this is not evident on LL/SC architectures, because
-while an LL/SC architecure 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
+while an LL/SC architecture 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
guarantees between competing LL/SC sections, such a guarantee does not
transfer to cmpxchg() implemented using LL/SC. Consider:

--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:27    [W:0.028 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site