lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm/highmem: Align-down to page the address for kunmap_flush_on_unmap()
From
On 1/26/23 20:50, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
>
> FWIW I think I would simplify the subject
> [PATCH] mm/highmem: Fix kunmap_local() on flush on unmap architectures
>
> Or something like that.
>
>> If ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP is defined (PA-RISC case), __kunmap_local()
>> calls kunmap_flush_on_unmap(). The latter currently flushes the wrong
>> address (as confirmed by Matthew Wilcox and Helge Deller). Al Viro
>> proposed to call kunmap_flush_on_unmap() on an aligned-down to page
>> address in order to fix this issue. Consensus has been reached on this
>> solution.
>>
>> Therefore, if ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP is defined, call
>> kunmap_flush_on_unmap() on an aligned-down to page address computed with
>> the PTR_ALIGN_DOWN() macro.
>>
>> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>> Confirmed-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>> Confirmed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
>> Fixes: f3ba3c710ac5 ("mm/highmem: Provide kmap_local*")
>> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> I have (at least) two problems with this patch...
>>
>> 1) checkpatch.pl complains about the use of the non-standard
>> "Confirmed-by" tags. I don't know how else I can give credit to Helge
>> and Matthew. However, this is not the first time that I see non-standard
>> tags in patches applied upstream (I too had a non-standard
>> "Analysed-by" tag in patch which fixes a SAC bug). Any objections?
>
> I think you can add Matthew and Helge as Suggested-by: All 3 had input on
> the solution.
>
>>
>> 2) I'm not sure whether or not the "Fixes" tag is appropriate in this
>> patch. Can someone either confirm or deny it?
>
> This 'fixes' looks correct to me. I don't know how many folks are running
> highmem with parisc but if they are I am sure they would appreciate the
> extra knowledge.

It seems nobody is running highmem on parisc, because it can't be enabled.
AFAICS, it's not in any parisc related Kconfig file.

> I do wonder if this should be cc'ed to stable to ensure it gets
> backported? Helge do you think there is a need for that?

For correctness I think it's nevertheless good to backport it.

>> include/linux/highmem-internal.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/highmem-internal.h b/include/linux/highmem-internal.h
>> index 034b1106d022..e247c9ac4583 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/highmem-internal.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/highmem-internal.h
>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static inline void *kmap_local_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
>> static inline void __kunmap_local(const void *addr)
>> {
>> #ifdef ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP
>> - kunmap_flush_on_unmap(addr);
>> + kunmap_flush_on_unmap(PTR_ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PAGE_SIZE));
>> #endif
>> }

That would be another possibility:

diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
index 0bdee6724132..ce5d1f8a23bd 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
+++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ void flush_anon_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page, unsigned lon
#define ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP
static inline void kunmap_flush_on_unmap(const void *addr)
{
+ addr = PTR_ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
flush_kernel_dcache_page_addr(addr);
}

Helge

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:57    [W:0.194 / U:1.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site