Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:23:42 +0700 | From | Bagas Sanjaya <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fixed typo in comments |
| |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:22:54PM +0100, Semen Zhydenko wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c > index 63a8ce7177dd..6430c00b05a9 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/timer.c > +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c > @@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ static int __timer_delete(struct timer_list *timer, bool shutdown) > * If @shutdown is set then the lock has to be taken whether the > * timer is pending or not to protect against a concurrent rearm > * which might hit between the lockless pending check and the lock > - * aquisition. By taking the lock it is ensured that such a newly > + * acquisition. By taking the lock it is ensured that such a newly > * enqueued timer is dequeued and cannot end up with > * timer->function == NULL in the expiry code. > *
No patch description, really?
Also please read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for how to properly submit kernel patches.
-- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |