Messages in this thread | | | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [patch V3 16/22] genirq/msi: Provide new domain id based interfaces for freeing interrupts | Date | Mon, 16 Jan 2023 20:49:02 +0100 |
| |
David!
On Mon, Jan 16 2023 at 19:28, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2023-01-16 at 20:22 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > Tested-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> >> > >> > Albeit only under qemu with >> > https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/qemu.git/shortlog/refs/heads/xenfv >> > and not under real Xen. >> >> Five levels of emulation. What could possibly go wrong? > > It's the opposite — this is what happened when I threw my toys out of > the pram and said, "You're NOT doing that with nested virtualization!". > > One level of emulation. We host guests that think they're running on > Xen, directly in QEMU/KVM by handling the hypercalls and event > channels, grant tables, etc. > > We virtualised Xen itself :)
Groan. Can we please agree on *one* hypervisor instead of growing emulators for all other hypervisors in each of them :)
> Now you have no more excuses for breaking Xen guest mode!
No cookies, you spoilsport! :)
tglx
| |