Messages in this thread Patch in this message | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <> | Subject | [PATCHv2 1/7] x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall() | Date | Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:14:01 +0300 |
| |
Comment in __tdx_hypercall() points that RAX==0 indicates TDVMCALL failure which is opposite of the truth: RAX==0 is success.
Fix the comment. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> --- arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S index f9eb1134f22d..74b108e94a0d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__tdx_hypercall) tdcall /* - * RAX==0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that + * RAX!=0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that * something has gone horribly wrong with the TDX module. * * The return status of the hypercall operation is in a separate -- 2.38.2
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |