lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/11] video/aperture: Only remove sysfb on the default vga pci device
From
On 1/11/23 8:58 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> On 1/11/23 16:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> This fixes a regression introduced by ee7a69aa38d8 ("fbdev: Disable
>> sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs"), where we
>> remove the sysfb when loading a driver for an unrelated pci device,
>> resulting in the user loosing their efifb console or similar.
>>
>> Note that in practice this only is a problem with the nvidia blob,
>> because that's the only gpu driver people might install which does not
>> come with an fbdev driver of it's own. For everyone else the real gpu
>> driver will restor a working console.
>
> restore
>
>>
>> Also note that in the referenced bug there's confusion that this same
>> bug also happens on amdgpu. But that was just another amdgpu specific
>> regression, which just happened to happen at roughly the same time and
>> with the same user-observable symptons. That bug is fixed now, see
>
> symptoms
>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216331#c15
>>
>> For the above reasons the cc: stable is just notionally, this patch
>> will need a backport and that's up to nvidia if they care enough.
>>
>
> Maybe adding a Fixes: ee7a69aa38d8 tag here too ?
>
>> References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216303#c28
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
>> Cc: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.19+ (if someone else does the backport)
>> ---
>> drivers/video/aperture.c | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/aperture.c b/drivers/video/aperture.c
>> index ba565515480d..a1821d369bb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/aperture.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/aperture.c
>> @@ -321,15 +321,16 @@ int aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices(struct pci_dev *pdev, const char *na
>>
>> primary = pdev == vga_default_device();
>>
>> + if (primary)
>> + sysfb_disable();
>> +
>> for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; ++bar) {
>> if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, bar) & IORESOURCE_MEM))
>> continue;
>>
>> base = pci_resource_start(pdev, bar);
>> size = pci_resource_len(pdev, bar);
>> - ret = aperture_remove_conflicting_devices(base, size, name);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + aperture_detach_devices(base, size);
>
> Maybe mention in the commit message that you are doing this change, something like:
>
> "Instead of calling aperture_remove_conflicting_devices() to remove the conflicting
> devices, just call to aperture_detach_devices() to detach the device that matches
> the same PCI BAR / aperture range. Since the former is just a wrapper of the latter
> plus a sysfb_disable() call, and now that's done in this function but only for the
> primary devices"
>
> Patch looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>

Thanks Daniel and Javier!

I wasn't able to reproduce the original problem on my hybrid laptop
since it refuses to boot with the console on an external display, but I
was able to reproduce it by switching the configuration around: booting
with i915.modeset=0 and with an experimental version of nvidia-drm that
registers a framebuffer console. I verified that loading nvidia-drm
breaks the efi-firmware framebuffer on Intel on Arch's
linux-6.1.4-arch1-1 kernel and that applying this patch series fixes it. So

Tested-by: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>

FWIW, the bug ought to be reproducible with i915.modeset=0 + any other
drm driver that registers a framebuffer.

-- Aaron

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:36    [W:0.053 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site