Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:15:43 -0600 | From | Mathieu Poirier <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] perf cs-etm: Split --dump-raw-trace by AUX records |
| |
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 05:10:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:33:36AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier escreveu: > > Hi Arnaldo, > > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:45:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier escreveu: > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 05:43:03PM +0100, James Clark wrote: > > > > > for example: > > > > > > > > > > Idx:808; ID:1c; I_BAD_SEQUENCE : Invalid Sequence in packet.[I_ASYNC] > > > > > ... > > > > > PKTP_ETMV4I_0016 : 0x0014 (OCSD_ERR_INVALID_PCKT_HDR) [Invalid packet header]; TrcIdx=822 > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > > > > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, applied. > > > > This patch is the second of a two patch series[1][2]. The first one was applied and > > is in Linus' current master branch. But I can't find the second one in > > either your core branch or Linus', and that despite your reply above that it has been > > applied. As such I am guessing something went wrong with the process. > > > > How do you want to proceed - should we resend the second patch[2] or you still > > have it somewhere in your Inbox? > > My bad, its no in tmp.perf/urgent, after testing together with other > patches will move to perf/urgent and by the end of this week I'll submit > it to Linus, sorry. >
Very good - thanks for the follow up.
> - Arnaldo > > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > > > [1]. https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/coresight/2021-June/006575.html > > [2]. https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/coresight/2021-June/006576.html > > > > > > > > - Arnaldo > > > > > -- > > - Arnaldo
| |