Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:22:28 +0100 | From | Chris Down <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the printk tree |
| |
Chris Down writes: >+Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Well, let's actually Cc them this time...
>Stephen Rothwell writes: >>After merging the printk tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) >>produced this warning: >> >>kernel/printk/printk.c:1: warning: 'printk' not found >> >>Introduced by commit >> >> 337015573718 ("printk: Userspace format indexing support") >> >>I presume that "printk" is referred to elsewhere in the documentation >>as being in this file. > >Hmm, this is an interesting one, because I think we still generally >just want to refer to the API as being `printk()`. Changing it all >over the place seems wrong. As you'd imagine, there are quite a few >references to this name, so it requires a lot of noise all over the >docs and inline comments. > >Jonathan and other docs folks, how can one tell Sphinx that when it >sees printk() it's referring to a function-like macro, or otherwise >squelch this reasonably? :-)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |