lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 5/5] ibmvfc: reinitialize sub-CRQs and perform channel enquiry after LPM
From
Date
On 2/25/21 2:48 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> A live partition migration (LPM) results in a CRQ disconnect similar to
> a hard reset. In this LPM case the hypervisor moslty perserves the CRQ
> transport such that it simply needs to be reenabled. However, the
> capabilities may have changed such as fewer channels, or no channels at
> all. Further, its possible that there may be sub-CRQ support, but no
> channel support. The CRQ reenable path currently doesn't take any of
> this into consideration.
>
> For simpilicty release and reinitialize sub-CRQs during reenable, and
> set do_enquiry and using_channels with the appropriate values to trigger
> channel renegotiation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
> index 4ac2c442e1e2..9ae6be56e375 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
> @@ -903,6 +903,9 @@ static int ibmvfc_reenable_crq_queue(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
> {
> int rc = 0;
> struct vio_dev *vdev = to_vio_dev(vhost->dev);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(vhost);
>
> /* Re-enable the CRQ */
> do {
> @@ -914,6 +917,16 @@ static int ibmvfc_reenable_crq_queue(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
> if (rc)
> dev_err(vhost->dev, "Error enabling adapter (rc=%d)\n", rc);
>
> + spin_lock_irqsave(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(vhost->crq.q_lock);
> + vhost->do_enquiry = 1;
> + vhost->using_channels = 0;
> +
> + ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost);
> +
> + spin_unlock(vhost->crq.q_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);

ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs can sleep, for multiple reasons, so you can't hold
a lock when you call it. There is a GFP_KERNEL allocation in it, and the
patch before this one adds an msleep in an error path.

Thanks,

Brian

--
Brian King
Power Linux I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-25 22:19    [W:0.055 / U:0.548 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site