lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/19] vsprintf: add new `%pA` format specifier
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 11:55 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:52:09AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:14 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 04:56:32PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:46 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > That should be in a .h file somewhere. Remember, don't put #ifdef in .c
> > > > > files please.
> >
> > Why not put #ifdef in .c files?
> >
> > > > Will do, thanks for reviewing!
> > > >
> > > > > Same here, this should not be needed if you put it in a .h file
> > > > > correctly.
> >
> > I guess IS_ENABLED could be used in the .c code, but I don't see how
> > they could move the dispatch to rust_fmt_argument to a header without
> > moving the definition of pointer() to a header, which they probably
> > _cant_ do because it's noinline_for_stack.
>
> In the header file, you put:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FOO
> int foo(void);
> #else
> static inline int foo(void) { }
> #endif
>
> and then in your .c file, you call foo() unconditionally, and everything
> works beautifully.
>

Ah, that is nice, thanks!

--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-06 21:03    [W:0.031 / U:1.792 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site