lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Lock problems in linux/tools/perf/util/dso.c
From
Hi, Namhyung,

1. Indeed, I got wrong here.
2. Yes, the branch should be if (pthread_mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock))
instead of if (pthread_mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock) < 0).

Could I send a patch?

Best,
Ryan

On 30/12/2021, 3:08 AM, "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:

Hello,

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 3:33 AM Ryan Cai <ycaibb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, I found a potential lock problem in dso_data_get_fd. Because the inconsistent branch conditions of pthread_mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock) and pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock), it is possible that the lock dso__data_open_lock is not released in the dso_data_get_fd. Also, I have a question on why the branch condition of pthread_mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock) is <0. I think that the branch condition should be !=0, because pthread_mutex_lock would return 0 when succeeding. Looking forward to further discussion. One this bug is confirmed, I can send a patch.

Please fix your mail client to wrap around 80 characters.

1. dso__data_get_fd() should be paired with dso__data_put_fd()
when it returns non-negative. It'd unlock the mutex.

2. I've checked the man page and it seems you're right.
It just says that it'd return an error number or zero.

https://linux.die.net/man/3/pthread_mutex_lock

Thanks,
Namhyung


>
>
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/e851dfae4371d3c751f1e18e8eb5eba993de1467/tools/perf/util/dso.c#L708-L722
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-30 03:43    [W:0.046 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site