Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Christian Gmeiner <> | Date | Sun, 26 Dec 2021 14:00:02 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API |
| |
HI all,
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 06:58 Uhr schrieb Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>: > > Hi Santosh, > > On 1/24/21 10:34 PM, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com wrote: > > Hi Suman, Mathieu, > > > > On 1/7/21 2:49 PM, Suman Anna wrote: > >> On 1/7/21 4:44 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 06:03:25PM -0600, Suman Anna wrote: > >>>> Hi Mathieu, > >>>> > > [...] > >>> I only see input from Andy and Lars in the thread you point out, nothing from > >>> Greg. I have also taken a look at the patch [1] that made checkpatch complain > >>> about ENOTSUPP. From what I see in that commit log the goal is to prevent new > >>> additions of ENOTSUPP to the kernel. > >>> > >>> Please modify and resend, otherwise I'm sure someone will send another patch to > >>> fix it before the end of the cycle. > >> > >> Yeah ok. I will send out a v3. > >> > > I haven't seen v3 of this series yet. Please post it > > if you would like to include it for 5.12. > > This series is dependent on couple of patches that would have to come through > the remoteproc tree first, and I need to post the next versions of those as > well. So, let me sort out those first. You can drop this from your queue for 5.12. >
Is there any update on this patch series?
-- greets -- Christian Gmeiner, MSc
https://christian-gmeiner.info/privacypolicy
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |