Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | David Lechner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add PRU consumer bindings | Date | Mon, 4 Jan 2021 13:56:01 -0600 |
| |
> Also, I think you can get rid of 'ti,pruss-gp-mux-sel'. Can't it just > be an arg cell in 'ti,prus' entries? > > Rob
+1 for using cells instead of a separate property.
FYI, we will have a similar issue with the PRUSSEVTSEL signal for the interrupt controller on the AM18XX. I am still of the opinion (described in more detail at [1]) that using a cell for this makes for both better device tree bindings and easier driver implementation. So I am interested to see what the resolution is here.
[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20190708035243.12170-5-s-anna@ti.com/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |