Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:51:57 +1000 (AEST) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/11] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE) |
| |
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> If block layer integrity was enough, there wouldn't have been a need > for fs-verity. Even fs-verity is limited to read only filesystems, > which makes validating file integrity so much easier. From the > beginning, we've said that fs-verity signatures should be included in > the measurement list. (I thought someone signed on to add that support > to IMA, but have not yet seen anything.) > > Going forward I see a lot of what we've accomplished being incorporated > into the filesystems. When IMA will be limited to defining a system > wide policy, I'll have completed my job.
What are your thoughts on IPE being a standalone LSM? Would you prefer to see its functionality integrated into IMA?
| |