lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: Intel: Add period size constraint on strago board
From
Date


On 8/3/20 8:00 AM, Lu, Brent wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Again, is this fixed 240 is a must? Or is this also an alignment issue?
>>> Hi Takashi,
>>>
>>> I think it's a must for Chromebooks. Google found this value works
>>> best with their CRAS server running on their BSW products. They
>>> offered this patch for their own Chromebooks.
>>
>> Hrm, but it's likely a worse choice on other sound backends.
>>
>> Please double-check whether this fixed small period is a must, or it's an
>> alignment issue.
> Hi Takashi,
>
> I've double checked with google. It's a must for Chromebooks due to low
> latency use case.

I wonder if there's a misunderstanding here?

I believe Takashi's question was "is this a must to ONLY accept 240
samples for the period size", there was no pushback on the value itself.
Are those boards broken with e.g. 960 samples?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-03 18:31    [W:1.556 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site