Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] io_uring: add restrictions to support untrusted applications and guests | From | Jens Axboe <> | Date | Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:50:44 -0600 |
| |
On 8/27/20 7:40 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > v5: > - explicitly assigned enum values [Kees] > - replaced kmalloc/copy_from_user with memdup_user [kernel test robot] > - added Kees' R-b tags > > v4: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20200813153254.93731-1-sgarzare@redhat.com/ > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20200728160101.48554-1-sgarzare@redhat.com/ > RFC v2: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20200716124833.93667-1-sgarzare@redhat.com > RFC v1: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20200710141945.129329-1-sgarzare@redhat.com > > Following the proposal that I send about restrictions [1], I wrote this series > to add restrictions in io_uring. > > I also wrote helpers in liburing and a test case (test/register-restrictions.c) > available in this repository: > https://github.com/stefano-garzarella/liburing (branch: io_uring_restrictions) > > Just to recap the proposal, the idea is to add some restrictions to the > operations (sqe opcode and flags, register opcode) to safely allow untrusted > applications or guests to use io_uring queues. > > The first patch changes io_uring_register(2) opcodes into an enumeration to > keep track of the last opcode available. > > The second patch adds IOURING_REGISTER_RESTRICTIONS opcode and the code to > handle restrictions. > > The third patch adds IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED flag to start the rings disabled, > allowing the user to register restrictions, buffers, files, before to start > processing SQEs. > > Comments and suggestions are very welcome.
Looks good to me, just a few very minor comments in patch 2. If you could fix those up, let's get this queued for 5.10.
-- Jens Axboe
| |