Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Fabio Estevam <> | Date | Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:16:05 -0300 | Subject | Re: (EXT) Re: (EXT) Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: tqma6: minor fixes |
| |
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:40 AM Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com> wrote:
> Makes sense. Does the following logic sound correct? > > - If num-cs is set, use that (and add it to the docs)
I would not add num-cs to the docs. As far as I can see there is no imx dts that uses num-cs currently.
> - If num-cs is unset, use the number of cs-gpios > - If num-cs is unset and no cs-gpios are defined, use a driver-provided > default > > > I'm not sure if 3 is a particularly useful default either, but it seems > it was chosen to accommodate boards that previously set this via > platform data. All SoCs I've checked (i.MX6Q/DL, i.MX6UL, i.MX7) have 4 > internal CS pins per ECSPI instance, so maybe the driver should use > that as its default instead?
I think it is time to get rid of i.MX board files. I will try to work on this when I have a chance.
bout using 4 as default chip select number, please also check some older SoCs like imx25, imx35, imx51, imx53, etc
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |