Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:23:25 +0100 | From | Marc Zyngier <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation |
| |
On 2020-08-19 22:53, Raphael Norwitz wrote: > The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number > loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...". > It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses" > instead > of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the > aforementioned wording. > > Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com> > --- > Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst > b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst > index 096db12..eba5e41 100644 > --- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing > identical callback > mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt > handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers. > > -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to > +Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to > hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could > be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root > interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
| |