Messages in this thread | | | From | Hao Luo <> | Date | Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:05:22 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id |
| |
Yonghong,
An update on this thread. I successfully reproduced this issue on a 8.2.0 gcc compiler, It looks like gcc 4.9 did not have this issue. I was also using clang which did not show this bug.
It seems having a DW_AT_specification that refers to another DW_TAG_variable isn't handled in pahole. I have a (maybe hacky) pahole patch as fix and let me clean it up and post for review soon.
Hao
| |