Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:08:58 +0900 | From | Sergey Senozhatsky <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] printk: implement pr_cont_t |
| |
On (20/08/20 12:16), Petr Mladek wrote: > Now that I think about it. This is the biggest problem with any temporary buffer > for pr_cont() lines. I am more and more convinced that we should just > _keep the current behavior_. It is not ideal. But sometimes mixed > messages are always better than lost ones.
Agreed. John, let's move this into a backlog for the time being? We can continue discussions, but first let's fix the empty lines for cont line print outs in the current dmesg output.
-ss
| |