Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v36 21/24] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX enclave call | From | Jethro Beekman <> | Date | Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:00:55 +0200 |
| |
On 2020-08-19 15:33, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:44 PM Jarkko Sakkinen > <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:15:32AM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: >>> That seems like overkill to me. I'm just asking for one additional mov >>> instruction. :) >> >> I started to consider eBPF since the complexity and constraints of the >> callback look like an overkill and without doubt will be a burden to >> maintain. > > That feels to me like more complexity just to move the existing > complexity from one place to another. >
Agreed that BPF doesn't make things better.
-- Jethro Beekman | Fortanix
[unhandled content-type:application/pkcs7-signature] | |