lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] coresight: tmc: Add shutdown callback for TMC ETR/ETF
Hi Robin, Mathieu

On 2020-06-03 17:07, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-06-01 22:28, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> That being said I'm sure that dependencies on an IOMMU isn't a problem
>> confined
>> to coresight. I am adding Robin Murphy, who added this commit [1], to
>> the thread
>> in the hope that he can provide guidance on the right way to do this.
>
> Right, it's not specific to CoreSight, and it's not even specific to
> IOMMUs really. In short, blame kexec ;)
>

Yes it is not specific to coresight, we are targeting this for all
consumers/clients of SMMU(atleast on SC7180 SoC). We have display
throwing
NoC/interconnect errors[1] during reboot after SMMU is disabled.
This is also not specific to kexec either as you explained here [2]
about
a case with display which is exacly what is happening in our system [1].

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1591009402-681-1-git-send-email-mkrishn@codeaurora.org/
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5858bdac-b7f9-ac26-0c0d-c9653cef841d@arm.com/

> The fundamental thing is that devices should stop any DMA activity at
> shutdown. For a normal poweroff you can typically get away without
> doing so, but over kexec, ongoing DMA traffic may corrupt memory in
> the new kernel (at worst, I think even DMA reads could potentially
> cause unexpected cache behaviour that might lead to mishaps, given the
> right combination of memory attributes).
>
> IOMMUs merely help to make the situation more serious. For similar
> kexec reasons, they need to disable any existing translations at
> shutdown (imagine if the second kernel didn't have an IOMMU driver).
> And at that point, even the normal poweroff case becomes problematic,
> because any device DMA that hasn't been shut down beforehand is now
> not necessarily going benignly to memory as it would in the no-IOMMU
> case above, but potentially to random physical addresses, with all the
> hilarity ensuing that you would expect from that.
>

Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-03 14:02    [W:0.103 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site