Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | paulmck@kernel ... | Subject | [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] srcu: Fix a typo in comment "amoritized"->"amortized" | Date | Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:33:31 -0700 |
| |
From: Ethon Paul <ethp@qq.com>
This commit fixes a typo in a comment.
Signed-off-by: Ethon Paul <ethp@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> --- kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c index 6d3ef70..8ff71e5 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ static void srcu_flip(struct srcu_struct *ssp) * it, if this function was preempted for enough time for the counters * to wrap, it really doesn't matter whether or not we expedite the grace * period. The extra overhead of a needlessly expedited grace period is - * negligible when amoritized over that time period, and the extra latency + * negligible when amortized over that time period, and the extra latency * of a needlessly non-expedited grace period is similarly negligible. */ static bool srcu_might_be_idle(struct srcu_struct *ssp) -- 2.9.5
| |