Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:24:15 +0200 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] squashfs: Migrate from ll_rw_block usage to BIO |
| |
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:37:15AM +0900, Philippe Liard wrote: > This is lower priority for us now but I agree that it would be good to land it. > This is my first patch being approved so I'm not familiar with the next steps. > Can you land it yourself or is there something more that I should do?
Normally Phillip should pick it up as the squashfs maintainer, but he has been last active about a year and a half ago.
Andrew, is this something you could pick up through the linux-mm tree?
> > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:35 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:20:33AM +0900, Philippe Liard wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 6:28 PM Philippe Liard <pliard@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 5:37 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the empty reply. > > > > > > > > > > This was meant to say that the patch looks good to me: > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > FYI I'm unfortunately no longer observing the 40% impact announced in the > > > commit description after many optimizations landed in the Chrome OS VM > > > infrastructure. > > > > > > Hopefully moving to BIO is still desirable though. Thank you in any case for > > > your help/guidance and all the time you spent reviewing this. > > > > Do you still plan to submit the patch? I think it is a major cleanup > > of the codebase, so I'd like to see it land. ---end quoted text---
| |