lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: VMX: untangle VMXON revision_id setting when using eVMCS
From
Date

On 3/6/20 4:28 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:57:25PM -0800, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
>> On 3/6/20 3:07 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:20:13PM -0800, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>>> @@ -2599,7 +2607,7 @@ void free_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs)
>>>>> int alloc_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - loaded_vmcs->vmcs = alloc_vmcs(false);
>>>>> + loaded_vmcs->vmcs = alloc_vmcs(VMCS_REGION);
>>>>> if (!loaded_vmcs->vmcs)
>>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>>> @@ -2652,25 +2660,13 @@ static __init int alloc_vmxon_regions(void)
>>>>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>>>> struct vmcs *vmcs;
>>>>> - vmcs = alloc_vmcs_cpu(false, cpu, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> + /* The VMXON region is really just a special type of VMCS. */
>>>> Not sure if this is the right way to correlate the two.
>>>>
>>>> AFAIU, the SDM calls VMXON region as a memory area that holds the VMCS data
>>>> structure and it calls VMCS the data structure that is used by software to
>>>> switch between VMX root-mode and not-root-mode. So VMXON is a memory area
>>>> whereas VMCS is the structure of the data that resides in that memory area.
>>>>
>>>> So if we follow this interpretation, your enum should rather look like,
>>>>
>>>> enum vmcs_type {
>>>> +    VMCS,
>>>> +    EVMCS,
>>>> +    SHADOW_VMCS
>>> No (to the EVMCS suggestion), because this allocation needs to happen for
>>> !eVMCS. The SDM never explictly calls the VMXON region a VMCS, but it's
>>> just being coy. E.g. VMCLEAR doesn't fail if you point it at random
>>> memory, but point it at the VMXON region and it yells.
>>>
>>> We could call it VMXON_VMCS if that helps.
>> Are you saying,
>>
>> + enum vmcs_type {
>> +     VMXON_REGION,
>> +     VMXON_VMCS,
>> +     SHADOW_VMCS_REGION,
>> +};
>>
>> ?
>>
>> In that case, "VMXON_REGION" and "VMXON_VMCS" are no different according to
>> your explanation.
> enum vmcs_type {
> VMXON_VMCS,
> VMCS,
> SHADOW_VMCS,
> };


It looks reasonable.


>
> alloc_vmcs_cpu() does more than just allocate the memory, it also
> initializes the data structure, e.g. "allocate and initalize a VMXON VMCS",
>
>>> The SDM does call the memory
>>> allocation for regular VMCSes a "VMCS region":
>>>
>>> A logical processor associates a region in memory with each VMCS. This
>>> region is called the VMCS region.
>>>
>>> I don't think I've ever heard anyone differentiate that two though, i.e.
>>> VMCS is used colloquially to mean both the data structure itself and the
>>> memory region containing the data structure.
>>>
>>>>> + vmcs = alloc_vmcs_cpu(VMXON_REGION, cpu, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> if (!vmcs) {
>>>>> free_vmxon_regions();
>>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>>> }
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> - * When eVMCS is enabled, alloc_vmcs_cpu() sets
>>>>> - * vmcs->revision_id to KVM_EVMCS_VERSION instead of
>>>>> - * revision_id reported by MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC.
>>>>> - *
>>>>> - * However, even though not explicitly documented by
>>>>> - * TLFS, VMXArea passed as VMXON argument should
>>>>> - * still be marked with revision_id reported by
>>>>> - * physical CPU.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
>>>>> - vmcs->hdr.revision_id = vmcs_config.revision_id;
>>>>> -
>>>>> per_cpu(vmxarea, cpu) = vmcs;
>>>>> }
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>>>>> index e64da06c7009..a5eb92638ac2 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>>>>> @@ -489,16 +489,22 @@ static inline struct pi_desc *vcpu_to_pi_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>>> return &(to_vmx(vcpu)->pi_desc);
>>>>> }
>>>>> -struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs_cpu(bool shadow, int cpu, gfp_t flags);
>>>>> +enum vmcs_type {
>>>>> + VMXON_REGION,
>>>>> + VMCS_REGION,
>>>>> + SHADOW_VMCS_REGION,
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs_cpu(enum vmcs_type type, int cpu, gfp_t flags);
>>>>> void free_vmcs(struct vmcs *vmcs);
>>>>> int alloc_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
>>>>> void free_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
>>>>> void loaded_vmcs_init(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
>>>>> void loaded_vmcs_clear(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
>>>>> -static inline struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs(bool shadow)
>>>>> +static inline struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs(enum vmcs_type type)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - return alloc_vmcs_cpu(shadow, raw_smp_processor_id(),
>>>>> + return alloc_vmcs_cpu(type, raw_smp_processor_id(),
>>>>> GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>>>>> }

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-07 02:36    [W:0.119 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site