lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 04/11] pwm: clps711x: Use 64-bit division macro
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 9:05 PM Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_args.period's datatype
> to u64, prepare for this transition by using DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST to
> handle a 64-bit divisor.
>
> Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
> index 924d39a..ba9500a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static void clps711x_pwm_update_val(struct clps711x_chip *priv, u32 n, u32 v)
> static unsigned int clps711x_get_duty(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int v)
> {
> /* Duty cycle 0..15 max */
> - return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(v * 0xf, pwm->args.period);
> + return DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(v * 0xf, pwm->args.period);
> }

Is it actually going to exceed U32_MAX? If not, a type cast may be
more appropriate here than the expensive 64-bit division.

Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-17 23:22    [W:0.088 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site