Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:41:31 -0500 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 11/11 v3] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion |
| |
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:13:17 +0100 Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> JFYI, the code reading and writing the cache looks good to me. > > It is still possible that some entries might stay unused (filled > with zeroes) but it should be hard to hit in practice. It > is good enough from my POV.
You mean the part that was commented?
> > I do not give Reviewed-by tag just because I somehow do not have power > to review the entire patch carefully enough at the moment.
No problem. Thanks for looking at it.
I'm adding a link to this thread, so if someone wants proof you helped out on this code, you can have them follow the links ;-)
Anyway, even if I push this to linux-next where I stop rebasing code (because of test coverage), I do rebase for adding tags. So if you ever get around at looking at this code, I can add that tag later (before the next merge window), or if you find something, I could fix it with a new patch and give you a Reported-by.
-- Steve
| |