lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 15/15] amdgpu: remove CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_USERPTR
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:57:24AM +0000, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 06.08.19 um 22:03 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 02:58:58PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 1:51 PM Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> wrote:
> >>> On 2019-08-06 13:44, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 07:05:53PM +0300, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>>>> The option is just used to select HMM mirror support and has a very
> >>>>> confusing help text. Just pull in the HMM mirror code by default
> >>>>> instead.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 2 ++
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Kconfig | 10 ----------
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 6 ------
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 12 ------------
> >>>>> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >>>> Felix, was this an effort to avoid the arch restriction on hmm or
> >>>> something? Also can't see why this was like this.
> >>> This option predates KFD's support of userptrs, which in turn predates
> >>> HMM. Radeon has the same kind of option, though it doesn't affect HMM in
> >>> that case.
> >>>
> >>> Alex, Christian, can you think of a good reason to maintain userptr
> >>> support as an option in amdgpu? I suspect it was originally meant as a
> >>> way to allow kernels with amdgpu without MMU notifiers. Now it would
> >>> allow a kernel with amdgpu without HMM or MMU notifiers. I don't know if
> >>> this is a useful thing to have.
> >> Right. There were people that didn't have MMU notifiers that wanted
> >> support for the GPU.
> > ?? Is that even a real thing? mmu_notifier does not have much kconfig
> > dependency.
>
> Yes, that used to be a very real thing.
>
> Initially a lot of users didn't wanted mmu notifiers to be enabled
> because of the performance overhead they costs.

Seems strange to hear these days, every distro ships with it on, it is
needed for kvm.

> Then we had the problem that HMM mirror wasn't available on a lot of
> architectures.

Some patches for hmm are ready now that will fix this

Jason

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-07 13:47    [W:0.140 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site