Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Thiago Jung Bauermann <> | Subject | [PATCH v4 2/6] swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active() | Date | Tue, 6 Aug 2019 01:49:15 -0300 |
| |
sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from generic code.
There's no need to mention which memory encryption feature is active, so just use a more generic message. Besides, other architectures will have different names for similar technology.
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> --- kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index 9de232229063..f29caad71e13 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -461,8 +461,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev, panic("Can not allocate SWIOTLB buffer earlier and can't now provide you with the DMA bounce buffer"); if (mem_encrypt_active()) - pr_warn_once("%s is active and system is using DMA bounce buffers\n", - sme_active() ? "SME" : "SEV"); + pr_warn_once("Memory encryption is active and system is using DMA bounce buffers\n"); mask = dma_get_seg_boundary(hwdev);
| |