Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] seccomp: fix compilation errors in seccomp-bpf kselftest | From | shuah <> | Date | Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:09:20 -0600 |
| |
On 8/22/19 3:58 PM, Alakesh Haloi wrote: > Without this patch we see following error while building and kselftest > for secccomp_bpf fails. > > seccomp_bpf.c:1787:20: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY’ undeclared (first use in this function); > seccomp_bpf.c:1788:6: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT’ undeclared (first use in this function); > > Signed-off-by: Alakesh Haloi <alakesh.haloi@gmail.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c > index 6ef7f16c4cf5..2e619760fc3e 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c > @@ -1353,6 +1353,14 @@ TEST_F(precedence, log_is_fifth_in_any_order) > #define PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP 7 > #endif > > +#ifndef PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY > +#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY 1 > +#endif > + > +#ifndef PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT > +#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT 2 > +#endif > + > #define IS_SECCOMP_EVENT(status) ((status >> 16) == PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP) > bool tracer_running; > void tracer_stop(int sig) >
Hi Kees,
Okay to apply this one for 5.4-rc1. Or is this going through bpf tree? If it is going through bpf tree:
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks, -- Shuah
| |