lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] riscv: add support for SECCOMP and SECCOMP_FILTER
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, David Abdurachmanov wrote:

> There is one failing kernel selftest: global.user_notification_signal

Is this the only failing test? Or are the rest of the selftests skipped
when this test fails, and no further tests are run, as seems to be shown
here:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CADnnUqcmDMRe1f+3jG8SPR6jRrnBsY8VVD70VbKEm0NqYeoicA@mail.gmail.com/

For example, looking at the source, I'd naively expect to see the
user_notification_closed_listener test result -- which follows right
after the failing test in the selftest source. But there aren't any
results?

Also - could you follow up with the author of this failing test to see if
we can get some more clarity about what might be going wrong here? It
appears that the failing test was added in commit 6a21cc50f0c7f ("seccomp:
add a return code to trap to userspace") by Tycho Andersen
<tycho@tycho.ws>.


- Paul

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-24 02:31    [W:0.255 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site