Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:09:46 +0530 | From | Sibi Sankar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: reset: aoss: Add AOSS reset binding for SC7180 SoCs |
| |
Hey Philipp, Thanks for the review!
On 2019-08-21 16:02, Philipp Zabel wrote: > On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 15:24 +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: >> Add SC7180 AOSS reset to the list of possible bindings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/qcom,aoss-reset.txt | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/qcom,aoss-reset.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/qcom,aoss-reset.txt >> index 510c748656ec5..8f0bbdc6afd91 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/qcom,aoss-reset.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/qcom,aoss-reset.txt >> @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ Required properties: >> - compatible: >> Usage: required >> Value type: <string> >> - Definition: must be: >> + Definition: must be one of: >> + "qcom,sc7180-aoss-cc" >> "qcom,sdm845-aoss-cc" >> >> - reg: > > Does sc7180 have exactly the same resets (mss, camss, venus, gpu, > dispss, wcss, and lpass) as sdm845? If so, it could be considered > compatible, and the driver changes wouldn't be needed at all:
Yes they are identical both AOSS and PDC resets.
> > - Definition: must be: > + Definition: must be one of: > + "qcom,sc7180-aoss-cc", "qcom,sdm845-aoss-cc" > > "qcom,sdm845-aoss-cc" > > Is there a reason not to do this?
I am fine with ^^, will change them in v2.
> > regards > Philipp
-- -- Sibi Sankar -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |